CLU.TO vs. ^GSPC

In the year-to-date period, CLU.TO achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CLU.TO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.28%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLU.TO and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum CLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.93%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLU.TO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) is 6.08%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that CLU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.